About this Entry
Posted by: garyfong1

Visit garyfong1's Xanga Site

Original: 6/1/2008 4:27 AM
Views: 1263
Comments: 5
eProps: 6

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site


Who gave the eProps?
2 eProps!2 eProps! 2 eProps from:
gmahler5th
fjblau
Bender_Dundat

Sunday, June 01, 2008

 
You may wonder how investigators can easily monitor and track the activities of persons of interest - I mean, isn't the computer anonymous?  Can't you just go to the internet cafe and nobody knows who you are?  What if you switch from Mac to PC?  What if you switch locations often - what if you switch computers often?  You can't be watched, can you?
The answer is simple and shocking.  It's the search engine who reveals who you are.  The millions of search engine requests that go by are monitored (just to see who is looking up how to make a fertilizer bomb, etc.)  Under an investigation - they only need to know your location once, and they only need to watch one session to begin to build a profile about you.  Once they can do that, they know when you change locations - even the address that you're at, even if you move a lot.
Leaving your computer with someone else doesn't lead to a false trace either.  The minute your unique relevance score doesn't match at that location, ears go on again and when you sign on, your unique signature and profile pop up, and you have company.

Your search patterns are very unique to you.  The sites that you visit are very unique to you.  So while you can move from computer to computer, change locations or IP addresses, once Homeland Security, a private cyber investigator or DOJ starts monitoring you - unless you can become somebody else with totally different hobbies, interests, etc. they'll sift out your profile in the superhighway of information and continue monitoring within minutes of your signing onto the internet.  This type of technology if powerful in monitoring anti-terrorism (this is one thing I agree about the patriot act).

So if you're downloading kiddie porn, or doing something else naughty, just know that tear gas can come flying through your window at any moment.
 Posted 6/1/2008 4:27 AM - 1263 Views - 6 eProps - 5 comments

Give eProps or Post a Comment

5 Comments

Visit gmahler5th's Xanga Site!

All that is not exactly true, Gary.  DOJ doesn't have continuous, ongoing access to the logs of any search engine.  The access they do get (if they get it) is by subpoena and that is only a snapshot in time. Without an actual criminal investigation, they do not get to see the user data that goes along with their activity.    Another thing, Google denied the DOJ access to their data in 2006. Even if they had obtained access, keep in mind the sheer volume of data that might exist, which is a problem of having TOO MUCH information and too little time to have an active monitoring system on anything but the most heinous crimes that threaten our national security (E.g. terrorism suspects).   That's the tip of an iceberg, and they may never even get access to all of that information at once.  That's not to say that someday super computers won't be efficient enough to actively monitor all of our thoughts and ideas in real-time, but that isn't going to happen until we get RFID implants at birth.  Bottom line, the technology and laws that will allow the kind of invasive spying that you are hinting at is quite a ways off from what we have today.

Posted 6/1/2008 9:56 AM by gmahler5th - recommend - reply

Visit fjblau's Xanga Site!
I was going to chime in with the same thing too... I do data analytics for a living... and that kind of real-time analysis of unstructured data just isn't there yet... without the cooperation and consent of way too many people... that have to date been extremely resistant to the idea at all.

There would have to be big fat pipes between DOJ and Google, with massive amounts of data being shipped across them in realtime... to be crunched by a data integration server capable of doing the unstructured analysis of that data...

It is just not cost effective or realistic for them to be doing this. That's not to say that when they DO have a target that they are not capable of doing some pretty deep tracking... but that is a vastly different analytic task than finding that needle in a haystack.
Posted 6/1/2008 1:30 PM by fjblau - recommend - reply

Visit garyfong1's Xanga Site!
That's what the media says!
Posted 6/1/2008 10:25 PM by garyfong1 Xanga True Member Xanga Lifetime Member - recommend - reply

Visit fjblau's Xanga Site!
Who ya gonna trust? The media, or HELLBOUND FRANK?

Case closed. :)
Posted 6/1/2008 10:42 PM by fjblau - recommend - reply

Visit Bender_Dundat's Xanga Site!
Ah yes, the pod people. My only escape these days is to lock myself in the basement with my theremin for hours
Posted 6/2/2008 12:39 AM by Bender_Dundat - recommend - reply


Sign in to CommentChoose Identity
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 
Profile Pic:
Default  |  Choose »  (?)

(?)

Back to garyfong1's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in garyfong1's local time zone:
GMT -08:00 (Pacific Standard - US, Canada)